Nov 122012
 

At 10 a.m. on Friday, a few friends and I headed to Occupy Sandy Clinton Hill’s hub to volunteer with relief efforts from Hurricane Sandy.  The Church of St. Luke and St. Matthew bustled with volunteers unloading trucks, sorting goods, or waiting for dispatch to either Coney Island or the Rockaways.  Pews served as shelves storing food and supplies.  In the second floor choir area, tech people fielded phone calls and entered information on spreadsheets.  Downstairs in the kitchen, volunteers cooked pasta, soup, and other hot foods.  We, along with about twenty other volunteers, headed to the altar for a general orientation on Occupy Sandy operations, and stayed for a more specific orientation for those volunteers interested in going out into the field.

After checking in with the driver dispatch people, we were on our way to the Rockaways.  We drove through the Broad Channel beach town before driving over the last leg of the Cross Bay Bridge.  “Why are all these cars parked by the median?” I asked, which no one had an answer.  Then I saw one car on top of another car, and a few feet further down, there was a boat on the side of the road.  Then it dawned on me – the cars and the boat had floated there during the hurricane.

When we arrived at the beach, it looked like a war torn village.  Piles of debris lay like islands.  Dirt roads replaced paved streets.  Metal gates covered storefronts – without electricity they could not open for business.  After getting out the car, we covered our mouth and noise to keep from inhaling kicked up dirt from passing trucks.  What remained of the boardwalk were concrete support columns jutted aground like dominoes arranged to be knocked over.

The Occupy Sandy distribution center operated out of St. Camillus Church’s gymnasium on Beach 99th Street.  Water, hot and cold food, clothes, cleaning supplies, toiletries/hygiene, and baby products were stacked on top of tables.  Residents of the community lined up outside the entrance.  Volunteers helped one person/family to find what they needed, while the rest waited outside for an available volunteer.  I helped three families find goods, and then sorted and organized a shipment of donated goods.  It was a lot of exhausting work.  My favorite moment of the day was seeing an 8 year old boy’s eyes light up when I found him a Darth Vader blanket!  My worst moment was having a resident curse at me and the whole operation because we were rationing diapers and could not give him a second pack.  I understood his distress but I could not do anything for him.

The Rockaways was ravaged by Hurricane Sandy.  If not for the distribution center and generous donations, the low-income hurricane survivors confront a difficult time getting food.  The A train towards the Rockaways remain out of service, and without vehicles, the residents face a major inconvenience of getting to the shuttle buses by Beach 25th Street and are then met with extremely crowded shuttle buses.

The National Guard was present in the Rockaways cleaning up the debris, and I saw a few Allstate National Catastrophe Team vehicles assessing insured homes.  Notably, what I did not see was any sign of FEMA or the American Red Cross.

The low-income Rockaway residents are disproportionately affected by Hurricane Sandy.  The Financial District was submersed in water and suffered without electricity, yet it was up and running within a week.  The social and environmental justice implications are obvious.  Restoring the high-income Financial District was the city government’s primary goal, while low-income neighborhoods like the Rockaways and Coney Island suffer without food, water, and heat.  As the government plans for disaster restoration and preventative infrastructure, immediately I wonder how the allocation of resources will be invested, and whether the low-income communities will continue to get the short end of the stick.

Occupy Sandy is a people powered movement for the people.  Volunteers have filled the gaps where the government and huge non-profit organizations cannot.  Occupy Sandy volunteers do not impose their beliefs on what the community thinks they need, and instead they ask the community what they need,  and tries their best to meet those needs.  I sincerely applaud their whole operation and mission, and look forward to continue volunteering with them on my free time.

 

 

 Posted by at 4:42 pm
Oct 242012
 

Last Wednesday CUER jointly hosted a Research Seminar on Urban Sustainability with the U.S. Forest Service and the NYC Urban Field Station at CUNY School of Law. Keith Tidball, Ph.D., of Cornell University’s Civic Ecology Lab, and Erika Svendsen, Ph.D., of the U.S. Forest Service’s NYC Urban Field Station, spoke on separate yet related topics within the theme of urban sustainability.

Dr. Tidball’s presentation was a focus on his concept of Greening in the Red Zone. This idea focuses on bringing the individual, societal and ecological benefits of community-based environmentally sustainable practices to disaster preparedness, relief and mitigation. His presentation at CUNY was more specifically about his studies in post-Hurricane Katrina New Orleans. As part of the rebuilding process, people from neighborhoods with traditionally differing demographics were coming together to plant trees and literally green the red zone.  Dr. Tidball discussed FEMA and a lack of funding for projects like greening the damaged urban landscape. The discussion then progressed to ways in which people look to trees and nature as symbols of life, or biophilia, as ways of moving through difficult times of death and destruction. Not long after, the love of life helps create a sense of, or love of, the place of living (topophilia), which assists with redevelopment and care for urbanscapes. Over time, the natural cycle is that people start to exploit the available resources as topophilia changes, and then conservation movements start. The cycle might repeat itself.

Dr. Svendsen discussed the evolution of urban stewardship groups, with a focus on her experiences in Baltimore and NYC. After reviewing a brief history of modern NYC stewardship groups, Dr. Svendsen detailed how these groups have grown less content with merely doing neighborhood “cleanups” and plantings, and have now moved into more of a “hands-on” civic steward role. The history of these groups was telling as to their current roles. In the 1970s, when NYC was broke and a symbol of a failed city, these groups first appeared to take over roles that were previously left to the government that could no longer handle them. As the City improved and retained money, in the 1990s groups would push back and politically challenge the City, establishing urban gardens on empty lots. Now, in the 2000s, the groups have increasingly worked collaboratively with the City government, and public-private relationships have popped up in almost every neighborhood. Many groups are now involved with formal rulemaking, technical expertise, fiscal management and urban design.

While these presentations primarily stayed within the parameters set by their respective speakers, I thought that law and environmental justice were pervasive in both. Administrative and property law are at play underneath the actions Drs. Tidball and Svendsen described. Sometimes the law facilitates, sometimes it slows down and sometimes it turns a blind eye. According to Dr. Tidball, for example, FEMA now reserves money for post-disaster greening projects—at least in New Orleans. The establishment of community gardens on unused city plots is an example of a good use of property with an authority figure looking the other way. Public-private partnerships, on the other hand, are tools for facilitation of the goals of urban stewardship groups.  Mayor Bloomberg’s Million Trees NYC and other PlaNYC initiatives come to mind.

Moreover, environmental justice exists in what both Dr. Tidball and Dr. Svendsen were saying. Urban stewardship groups sprung up to handle environmental, health and urban issues that government failed to properly deliver. As the groups these days get more involved with rulemaking, technical expertise and urban design, neighborhoods become increasingly poised to deal with challenges presented by environmental and social injustice—especially those that have existed because of the former uses of surrounding lands, or from historically unequal burdens (economically, environmentally, etc.). Dr. Tidball focused on post-Katrina New Orleans, but the blog inspired by his original Greening in the Red Zone work (to which he seems to be a frequent poster) gives examples of how urban blight is a type of a red zone. Dr. Svendsen talked about how in NYC some of the most interactive and outspoken stewardship groups are in areas like the Brooklyn-Queens border and in The Bronx—areas that are developing residentially; formerly industrial; and that have historically had heavy environmental and health burdens.[1] These neighborhoods that are more heavily burden and environmental justice areas seem to fit within Dr. Tidball’s example of Red Zone. It is interesting and important to see the variety of fields that must interact to address urban and environmental justice problems.


[1] On the other hand, well-greened and older, less industrially-impacted neighborhoods like Sunnyside/Sunnyside Gardens in Queens have stewardship groups that are more active within their own neighborhoods. Dr. Svendsen specifically mentioned Sunnyside as less interactive; some friends at TreeKit confirmed its high level of trees.

 Posted by at 3:23 pm
Oct 222012
 

Lhaq’temish, the Lummi People, are the original inhabitants of Washington state’s northernmost coast.  They have the U.S.’s largest Native fishing fleet, and have fished off Xwe’chi’eXen (Cherry Point, Washington) for thousands of years.

The natives recently protested against terminals that would allow coal to be brought to the Pacific Coast from Montana and Wyoming that would ultimately be transported to China and the rest of Asia.  They are concerned with a very real and potential threat of the transport systems affecting their health, natural resources and their economies.  If the coal should spill, there is a possible injury to their religious and sacred sites.  Moving millions of tons of coal through the region could affect road traffic and economic life on the reservations.  Dust and particulate matter from the train and barges invoke environmental hazards.

Also, Pacific Northwest tribes’ fishing rights will be affected by the coal terminals.  The tribes have a right to half the harvestable salmon, establishing tribal co-management of Washington State fisheries.  Polluted waterways in Washington have already resulted in the lowest yield of salmon in about 40 years, and transporting coal by railway through these areas will yield even lower quantities of harvestable salmon.

The Lummi Nation is a part of the Affiliated Tribes of Northwest Indians which requested that the U.S. Army Corp of Engineers perform a full environmental analysis of the six proposed shipping terminals along Oregon and Washington waterways.

The tribe’s mission is to protect the natural resources into perpetuity for the benefit of their community.  The Chairman of the Lummi Nation stated “It is our Xw’xalk Xechnging [sacred duty] to preserve and protect all of Xwe’chi’eXen.”

Indigenous People’s Day, which is a counter-celebration to Columbus Day, was formed as a protest to the historical conquest of North America and to the demise of Native American people and culture.  Indigenous people all over the world have been substantially impacted by the environmental hazards of industrialization while benefitting the least from industrial practices.  Conversely, industry actors have been least effected by environmental threats and benefit the most from their practices.

Here, if the coal transport system is developed, the Lummi Nation will bear the burden of the environmental degradation cause by the coal terminals.  In stark contrast, the coal industry actors will profit and hardly feel the impact of the environmental hazards within their own lives and communities.

 Posted by at 9:00 am